Featured Questions

Askinglaw, A Legal Question and Answer Site Welcome to Askinglaw.com. Askinglaw is a law question and answer site. Post your legal related questions and wait for answers or comments from the Askinglaw community. Askinglaw also has an online lawyer...

Readmore

Askinglaw's Online Lawyer Directory Has Been Updated Hello Askinglaw Visitors, The online lawyer directory on Askinglaw has been redesigned. You can see the updated directory by state at: www.askinglaw.com/lawyer-directory. The revamped attorney directory...

Readmore

Updated Lawyer Directory and Article Submission Askinglaw is pleased to announce that our sister site, Targetlaw has just been re-released as an Attorney Directory and Legal Article Submission Site. If you are looking for a lawyer, law firm, or attorney,...

Readmore

Damage to my car, California A large tree branch fell on top of my car and damaged the roof (bent roof). Police was present and there is a police report describing the incident and my car's damage was noted in the report; according...

Readmore

MIP, Oregon My Question Involves State Law In: Oregon I was at a party with a few friends (under 10) and we were all hanging out watching tv and drinking a few beers. One of our friends left without us knowing...

Readmore

  • Prev
  • Next

What effect did the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Slaughterhouse Cases have on its Dred Scott decision

Posted on : 11-11-2009 | By : Legal Information | In : Constitution/Court Decisions, Legal Articles

Tags:

0

In the Dred Scott decision, the Supreme court held that citizenship of a State and citizenship of the United States were essentially the same thing. Therefore, a Negro of slave descent could not be a citizen of a State, under the Constitution of the United States (though such a person could be a citizen of a State, under the constitution of an individual State) and because of this could not be a citizen of the United States. The reason being their ancestors were not citizens of a different State (under the Articles of Confederation) when the Constitution of the United States WAS ADOPTED (See Article II, Section 5, Clause 1 “Natural Born Citizen clause”).

The Slaughterhouse Cases had the following effect on Dred Scott. In the Slaughterhouse Cases, the Supreme Court held that because of the Fourteenth Amendment, citizenship of a State and citizenship of the United States were now to be separate and distinct from each other. [Footnote] A Negro of slave descent was made, under the Fourteenth Amendment, a citizen of the United States. To become also a citizen of a State, all he or she had to do was to reside in an individual State.

——————

Footnote:

The reason the Supreme court held that citizenship of a State was to be separate and distinct from citizenship of the United States was because the Fourteenth Amendment does not apply to those who were born before it was adopted, that is July 28, 1868. (Note: Section 1, Clause 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment states: “All persons born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside” and does not state: “All persons born in the United States AFTER THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”)

Because of this, the Supreme court, in the Slaughterhouse Cases, held that because of the Fourteenth Amendment there are now two citizens under the Constitution of the United States (and not the Fourteenth Amendment), a citizen of the United States, under the Fourteenth Amendment and a citizen of the several States, under Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1. For futher information,
http://www.australia.to/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=15882 .

© 2009

Write an answer

Powered by WP Hashcash