Featured Questions

Askinglaw, A Legal Question and Answer Site Welcome to Askinglaw.com. Askinglaw is a law question and answer site. Post your legal related questions and wait for answers or comments from the Askinglaw community. Askinglaw also has an online lawyer...

Readmore

Askinglaw's Online Lawyer Directory Has Been Updated Hello Askinglaw Visitors, The online lawyer directory on Askinglaw has been redesigned. You can see the updated directory by state at: www.askinglaw.com/lawyer-directory. The revamped attorney directory...

Readmore

Updated Lawyer Directory and Article Submission Askinglaw is pleased to announce that our sister site, Targetlaw has just been re-released as an Attorney Directory and Legal Article Submission Site. If you are looking for a lawyer, law firm, or attorney,...

Readmore

Damage to my car, California A large tree branch fell on top of my car and damaged the roof (bent roof). Police was present and there is a police report describing the incident and my car's damage was noted in the report; according...

Readmore

MIP, Oregon My Question Involves State Law In: Oregon I was at a party with a few friends (under 10) and we were all hanging out watching tv and drinking a few beers. One of our friends left without us knowing...

Readmore

  • Prev
  • Next

Injury resulting from obeying an Home Owners Association mandate

Posted on : 07-03-2009 | By : Legal Information | In : Other Legal Topics

0

The Home Owners Association to which I belong enforces a mandate (not sure if this is the proper word for it) which decrees that all homes on the lower levels must maintain the tree heights on their properties at 16′ or lower to assure the ocean views of homes on the ridge line above these lower-level properties. There is no restriction that applies to the tree-heights on the properties of the homes on the higher levels, presumably because, being on higher ground, they do not block anyone’s views of the ocean. Enforcement is complaint-driven.

A problem for many home-owners on the lower levels is that adherence to the 16′ height-level of trees is prohibitive, costing thousands of dollars to contract for professionals to trim or cut down the trees. Many elderly people who live in our community governed by this HOA mandate are on fixed incomes and cannot afford this huge expense.

My question is this: If a home owner, ordered by the home owners association to adhere to the mandate, were to hurt himself or herself attempting to trim or cut down the trees on his/her property himself or herself, could he/she sue the home owners association?

A second question is: If the injured homeowner were awarded a judgment against the home owners association, would the HOA be able to assess its members for payment of this judgment award?

A third question: Is there ANYTHING a home-owner without the funds to comply with this HOA tree-height mandate do not to comply?

Thank you!

Want to Ask a Similar Question? Click Here

Write an answer

Powered by WP Hashcash